So todays irritant involves the collective activities of google (you know them?) as well as the Connecticut AG in a change of attitude about the activities.
A moment about google - I acknowledge (and even embrace) the irony of using a "free" public blog hosted under google services while I call them names. I know (as do you) that if you are not purchasing a product from a company that in fact you are the product. And yes, Soylant Green is made of people.
A moment about the offense (since there seems to be no real suggestion that they did not in fact do this I remove the usual 'alleged' qualifier). Short version - in order to have a better idea about who is exactly where when they use the google location services. As part of the street view program (where they drive around and take pictures of streets, houses and whatnot) they hoovered up wireless data from unsecured wireless installations instead of just the id of the transmitter. After denying that they did this (a profoundly dicky thing), they acknowledged the act and threw the programmers under the bus since that it what management does.
So who really gives a shit?
Former Attorney General Richard Blumenthal last December in response to Google's 'accidental' collection of payload data from WiFi networks had the following to say:
“Verifying Google’s data snare is crucial to assessing a penalty and assuring no repeat. Consumers and businesses expect and deserve a full explanation, as well as measures shielding them from future spying. We will scrupulously safeguard the confidentiality of information we review.
“We will fight to compel Google to come clean–granting my office access to improperly collected materials and protecting confidentiality, as the company has done in Canada and elsewhere.”
I like this for many reasons including the simple fact that it is the right thing to do.
So it is the users fault. So think of it like this. Google goes around the neighborhood and tries all the doors. If it is unlocked they write down your address, take a picture of your house and walk in and copy any sort of mail or paperwork that happens to be sitting around by the door. Then they leave. They are asked about it, and deny it. A month later they say that they were actually doing this and sorry, we were only planning on trying the doors and writing down the addresses! The AG asks to see what sort of personal correspondence was copied and is told to go fuck himself. Later a new AG says that the correspondence is more or less irrelevant and that people need to have done a better job of locking their doors and keeping their bills in order.
This is why I am slowly going mad.
Enter new Attorney General George Jepsen, who is now saying:
Jepsen said Friday that his office will enter into settlement negotiations with the company without reviewing the pilfered data, which Google has steadfastly refused to share with it. Under the terms of the deal between the two, Connecticut will drop the civil investigative demand it was using to force Google to produce the data at issue here, and Google will stipulate to collecting and storing it. It will also stipulate that the data collected included confidential and private information like “partial or complete e-mail communications.”
Note that google does not have to get rid of the data that it has.
So why, good readers am I so pissed off? We are living after all in a Business Friendly universe now. There is a second press release which says in part:
For Immediate Release FRIDAY JAN. 28, 2011
HARTFORD – In recognition of Data Privacy Day, Attorney General George Jepsen Friday advised Connecticut residents to protect their personal and communications data by encrypting their own wireless Internet networks.
The recommendation stemmed from Connecticut’s investigation into Google Inc.’s collection of payload data being transmitted over unsecured business and consumer networks. That investigation led to a stipulation with Google that will avoid the need to go to court as settlement negotiations continue.
“Google’s collection of payload data demonstrates that others may be watching your Internet activity without your knowledge,” Jepsen said. “Consumers should know that the wireless routers they purchase from the store are not automatically encrypted, and they need to activate the encryption feature to ensure better protection,” Jepsen said.
So it is the users fault. So think of it like this. Google goes around the neighborhood and tries all the doors. If it is unlocked they write down your address, take a picture of your house and walk in and copy any sort of mail or paperwork that happens to be sitting around by the door. Then they leave. They are asked about it, and deny it. A month later they say that they were actually doing this and sorry, we were only planning on trying the doors and writing down the addresses! The AG asks to see what sort of personal correspondence was copied and is told to go fuck himself. Later a new AG says that the correspondence is more or less irrelevant and that people need to have done a better job of locking their doors and keeping their bills in order.
This is why I am slowly going mad.
No comments:
Post a Comment